Loading Events

« All Events

  • This event has passed.

Senate Appropriations Bill Maintains Critical Housing Investments While House Bill Makes Deep Cuts

August 1, 2024 @ 4:00 pm

The Senate and House appropriations committees took sharply different approaches to funding rental assistance programs for 2025. While the Senate Appropriations Committee’s bill would fully fund existing housing vouchers and provide more resources for other critical housing and homelessness programs, the House Appropriations Committee’s proposal would result in an estimated 240,400 fewer households receiving vouchers and cut other affordable housing resources. As Congress continues appropriations for 2025, it should adopt the Senate’s higher funding levels and prioritize renewing rental assistance to help people with low incomes afford a stable home.

While increases in rental costs have slowed, rents remain high compared to incomes, and the voucher program is still catching up. More funding for voucher subsidies is needed to maintain current levels of assistance and to ensure that families can use their vouchers in a range of housing options that best suit their needs.

The Senate bill adds enough funding to renew existing housing vouchers, assuming no unexpected increases in program costs. It also provides funding for 3,000 new vouchers for foster youth and for veterans experiencing homelessness — and $268 million above 2024 levels for programs that connect people experiencing homelessness to services and housing.

The Senate bill also includes a demonstration project to test whether using voucher subsidy funds to cover tenants’ security and utility deposits helps households use their vouchers more easily in high-cost, low-vacancy rental markets. Another provision would let the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) give housing agencies additional flexibilities in using population-specific vouchers for people with disabilities and foster youth, acknowledging the barriers these households face and making it easier for them to use their vouchers to secure a home.

Conversely, the House bill increases funding slightly over 2024 levels for Housing Choice Vouchers, but not enough to maintain current levels of assistance. It would serve 240,400 fewer households, we estimate. (See tables below for state-level and demographic housing voucher loss estimates.) Unlike in other years, housing agencies will have limited program reserves in 2025 to help offset any funding shortfalls.

Housing Choice Vouchers are our most effective tool to address homelessness and housing instability, and they serve more than 5 million people. However, the most recent data show that 77 percent of renters with low incomes who need federal rental assistance don’t receive it, as a result of years of underfunding. This unmet need has been slowly increasing in recent years, and further reducing assistance will exacerbate harm.

One reason for the stark difference between the bills: House Republicans omitted critical funding adjustments under the bipartisan agreements in 2023 that raised the federal debt ceiling and set spending caps for 2024 and 2025. The Senate incorporated the funding adjustments and other additional funding in its appropriations bill, enabling it to maintain current levels of rental assistance.

But the agreement’s tight spending caps still limited the funding that could be used to help more people experiencing housing instability. Congress needs to reevaluate these caps and provide additional investments in proven solutions like rental assistance to meet demand and prevent further increases in the number of people experiencing homelessness.

The House bill would eliminate funding for eviction prevention resources; a program focused on inclusive zoning; the Native Hawaiian Housing Block Grant, which helps eligible Native Hawaiians with low incomes live on their homelands; and the Choice Neighborhoods Initiative, which is needed to revitalize public and affordable housing and the surrounding neighborhoods that have long been denied resources due to redlining and other discriminatory policies. It would also cut the HOME Investment Partnerships Program, which funds affordable housing development and rehabilitation, by $750 million.

The House bill also includes a number of harmful policy provisions:

  • blocking localities that have adopted laws or policies that limit their coordination with federal immigration enforcement (“sanctuary cities”) from receiving federal funding;
  • preventing HUD from finalizing its proposed Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing rule, a critical tool for helping to combat and reverse the impacts of discrimination in housing and community development policies;
  • eliminating a requirement originally established under a COVID-19 relief law that owners of federally assisted properties give at least 30 days’ notice to a tenant facing eviction for non-payment of rent;
  • blocking HUD’s ability to implement efforts to promote equity and inclusion for staff and within programs;
  • undermining efforts to address the climate crisis; and
  • protecting organizations that discriminate against LGBTQIA+ people.

Unfortunately, both bills cut funding for public housing compared to 2024 levels, continuing a long pattern of disinvestment in this source of affordable housing for its more than 1.6 million residents. The House bill would reduce funding by nearly $600 million (6.8 percent), while the Senate bill would make a smaller cut of $28 million. Congress should ensure that a final 2025 bill fully funds public housing. However, both bills would increase Native American housing programs by $111 million to help correct for a decrease in buying power over the program’s history.

Moving forward, Congress needs to reject spending caps and expand rental assistance to help all people with low incomes who need it.

TABLE 1
Estimated Reduction of Housing Vouchers Under House Bill, by State
StateReduction in Households ServedPeople Impacted by Lost Vouchers
Alabama3,5008,900
Alaska500800
Arizona2,4006,000
Arkansas2,4004,900
California32,40071,700
Colorado3,3007,500
Connecticut4,1009,300
Delaware5001,100
District of Columbia1,2002,500
Florida11,20028,100
Georgia5,70014,600
Hawai’i1,2003,200
Idaho7001,500
Illinois10,20022,900
Indiana3,9008,500
Iowa2,1004,000
Kansas1,2002,400
Kentucky3,4007,700
Louisiana5,00012,200
Maine1,2002,400
Maryland5,30012,700
Massachusetts9,50020,300
Michigan5,90013,100
Minnesota3,3009,400
Mississippi2,5006,600
Missouri3,4008,900
Montana6001,100
Nebraska1,2002,600
Nevada1,6004,000
New Hampshire1,1002,200
New Jersey8,30018,300
New Mexico1,2002,500
New York25,40052,400
North Carolina5,80013,400
North Dakota8001,400
Ohio9,10020,700
Oklahoma2,5005,500
Oregon3,8008,100
Pennsylvania8,10017,700
Puerto Rico2,9006,500
Rhode Island9002,100
South Carolina2,6006,200
South Dakota6001,200
Tennessee3,6009,000
Texas15,70040,500
Utah1,2002,800
Vermont8001,700
Virginia5,20012,400
Washington6,00013,800
West Virginia1,5003,000
Wisconsin2,8005,700
Wyoming300500
Guam3001,100
Northern Mariana Islands39200
Puerto Rico2,9006,500
U.S. Virgin Islands200300
Total U.S.240,400548,200

Note: Figures are rounded to the nearest hundred (unless under 100) and may not sum to totals due to rounding.
Source: 2023 HUD Picture of Subsidized Households, HUD Housing Choice Vouchers Dashboard

TABLE 2
Demographics of Households and People Harmed by Housing Voucher Shortfall in House Bill
StatePeople Impacted by Lost Vouchers
Race and Ethnicity 
Native American/Alaska Native3,600
Asian/Pacific Islander17,100
Black283,900
Latine104,900
White130,400
Other Populations 
Children211,300
Older Adults87,300
People With Disabilities138,900
Women and Girls341,200

Scroll to Top